View Single Post
Old 04-01-2008, 10:00 AM   #37 (permalink)
signupdamnit
im not here for the points it just looks like i am
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
Points: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by hardcoreblogger View Post
this is serious stuff. while i don't promote any programs with the obvious huge leaks (yes there are lots of them) your other findings might explain why most ccbill sponsors convert like shit for me. how do you check on the cookie durations?
Credit to Jel who suggsts an easy way:

http://www.netpond.com/adult-webmast...ml#post1744160

Quote:
signupdammit, that's some serious data!
If you count minor leaks nearly 40% of the ccbill programs I saw had them. If you count only the other stuff, less than 10%.

What I take from this is that normally a lot of these guys would simply set the shave-o-matic, but since it is ccbill they were forced to come up with another way. One which is more easily caught. It made me go hmmmm.

Something to think about with a non-ccbill sponsor, even if the cookie length SET is 255 days, this doesn't mean their internal system will still READ that cookie AND give you credit. You have no way of knowing and you must trust them. Trust and integrity is especially important for non-ccbill sponsors.
signupdamnit is offline   Reply With Quote Send a private message to signupdamnit