Quote:
Originally Posted by Mihx
While most (straight) men do seem to like naked chicks  , I don't really think that reasoning applies particularly well - and if it's the TotemCash guys themselves who are suggesting it, I dare say it's a bit of a marketing trick aimed at webmasters.
I don't think I'm exaggerating too much if I suggest that trying to promote VirtuaGirl HD on various more or less obscure niche sites, wouldn't get you much better results than putting glamour babe links up on the same sites.
You might get a sale here and there, but I certainly wouldn't expect stellar ratios.
The whole desktop stripping thing might be a pretty unique concept - or way of representing the content - but personally I would still file the product and the accompanying website under the rather broad "babe" label.
That might not spark a whole lot of interest among those looking for interracial gangbangs, BDSM or midgets in latex  . Though I do imagine it could indeed do well on certain mainstream sites - the basic free version of the program would pretty much qualify as R-rated, with no explicit content (if I recall correctly, the girls don't even take their tops off in the short free samples).
|
yep, you are right. I am agreed with that and know it since i started promoting them, but again it should be more "universal" product you can sell on almost any kind of traffic, while for example you can't sell mature fatties at a teen site
edit: I also agree it would be more cool if they start providing some more niched content, like fetish strippers and etc, not just babe and gay strippers..