Quote:
Originally Posted by rebekahdee
Adriaan - I've got to say WTF mate! If you have an issue please contact me directly instead of slandering my site in public.
|
Well, this works fine for me. You advertise your site here on Netpond (in public) and I give you some critique on Netpond (in public).
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebekahdee
Let me just have a moment to respond. Our sites are hosted on the Camz servers and in return we have to carry some advertising. It's part of the deal and it is a very good deal that gives me unlimited disc space and bandwidth. It all amounts to better value for the customers as they get longer videos at higher bit rates. Would you prefer less quality and no leakage? You win some you lose some, swings and roundabouts!
|
As an affiliate I don't care what kindof deal you made with your hoster. As an affiliate I want a
LEAK FREE TOUR, with no
DISTRACTIONS from signing up with the
PAYSITE.
Having my surfers signing up is why I send traffic to sponsors. Not because I'm doing somekind of charity for my sponsors, what's wrong with that?
Hell, I promote sites that have leaks on the tours and I even promote your sites. But I think that your tour is full with MASSIVE LEAKS and that's not acceptable for me.
Also, your saying that having Cams.com banner on the site is "part of the deal".
Then tell me how promoting
VIDEOSZ can be part of the deal too?
--> to me it sounds like making money off affiliate traffic.
Then tell me how sending AFFILIATE traffic to the links page which is full with paysite banners can be part of the deal too?
--> to me it sounds like making money off affiliate traffic.
Then tell me how sending AFFILIATE traffic to your panties store can be part of the deal too?
--> to me it sounds like making money off affiliate traffic. Making the page look busier is not what an affiliate is looking for...
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebekahdee
Would you prefer less quality and no leakage? You win some you lose some, swings and roundabouts!
|
Yes I would like to have less leaks and I think the quality will be equal. I don't understand how two or three banner (plus a shit load on the links page) can give a page more quality.
Also linking to review sites SUCKS fgr affiliates.
1) I send MY surfer to the tour. I'm the one who introduced MY surfer to the site.
2) My surfer reads review on reviewsites.
3) My surfer CLICKS on the reviewsites AFFILIATE link and buys a membership.
4) Reviewsite gets credit from MY surfer and not me.
Do you think that's fair? I don't to be honest. I'm pretty fucking flabbergasted that there are no more people asking questions about this. I can remember Paul Markham had leaks on his site too (ALOT LESS THAN YOU) and a shit load of people shot him for doing it.
Oh yeah, in my opinion people know your site is not "BUM-DEAD" because you show ALL THE LATEST UPDATES.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebekahdee
To claim I am some how seeking to actively rip off affiliates is a joke mate, really truly and honestly it's utter bullsh*t. It is within everyone's interests to work together in order to get signups to the my site. I'm busy enough trying to increase sales without scheming to rip off affiliates.
|
Sorry about the words I used in this thread. That was wrong and I shouldn't have done that. My apologies for that.
I hope you understand now that having MASSIVE LEAKS on the tour is bad for affiliates because they lose signups. Of course having those leaks is a
"very good addition to your site", but how can I blame you? Your making signups with Videosz dont you? Your making signups from your links page dont you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebekahdee
Thanks for listening.
Rob.
|
Thank you too for listening, and do something with Anne's suggestion. Make another LEAK FREE tour for affiliates to send their traffic too.