What's so controversial about this picture?

[KT_Eroticy]

if we make it such a big deal, the more money she'll get paid...

[SleazyBear]

Its about publicity, its just one of those things to get her name in the front of the papers and in the news.. Nothing spectacular, just more crap in the news..

[LezGeri]

I think it's a stunningly beautiful picture. A real work of art.

That's the only reason I can see for making a fuss about it.

[NY Jester]

its the whole shes 15 and her fans are under that age usually..she needs to be doing sneaker ads not VF semi nude sexy photoshoots....kids grow up fast enough these days

[mimi]

her fan base is made up of pre-teens and teens with questionable pictures on their myspace pages.think about that before using the fan base argument.

[Gasta]

We only see her back nothing else, and the picture is not sexually suggestive. I don't see anythong wrong or questionable in this pic.

[mikesinner]

The pic makes her look ugly and she is not really an ugly girl. She is not beautiful but I think that picture makes her look really bad. That photographer should be shot.

[docputer]

She was completely dressed in the picture..if you go to the Vanity Fair website they have the pictures of the photo shoot. The picture shows what she looks like with no makeup but lipstick

[kaz]

Originally Posted by porndragon

Oh ok I know the show and her just didn't recognize her in that pic. Probably just making a deal out of it because she is a teen role model and they are worried she will turn into another Britney eventually lol

I'd be more concerned about her turning into another Jamie Lynn...

[easymama]

she's 14 I think...and worth a ton of dough...she's like the only female role model out there for little girls that are going to end up like lindsey lohan, britney...paris...it's pretty shitty

[AbsolutePorn]

She has lovely eyes!

[Dupont]

I have no problems with it, its a artsey photograph to me

[Meat]

Originally Posted by ARS Michelle

She's 15 yrs old.

and that would be why lol

u have to question parents and photog for even putting her in a psoition where shes getting pics taken like this tho

[Danielle]

I think they should let the YOUNG girl enjoy her childhood. Don't force her to be someone she is not. AKA older.

Hugs,
Danielle

[LezGeri]

Oh for pity's sake ponders we're not talking about some quasi-pedo soft-porno shoot here.

We're not even talking about Brooke Shields in Blue Lagoon of Jodie Foster in Taxi Driver.

[micho]

Weird face really :P

[lyno]

Originally Posted by LezGeri

We're not even talking about Brooke Shields in Blue Lagoon of Jodie Foster in Taxi Driver.

Or Jodie Foster in The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane

In order to earn a PG rating, the U.S. version of the film differs from the international release in two ways. First, a line of dialogue containing an expletive is absent in the U.S. version. Second, the international cut contains a scene in which Rynn is naked, with her buttocks and part of her breast visible. (Jodie Foster's body double for that scene was her older sister Connie, who was 21 at the time.) MGM's Region 1 DVD for the film contains the international version of the film, though the packaging still lists the PG rating.

Saw that movie when i was a teenager on TV. Fortunately i had no VCR
those times since i might have recoreded it

[PornBlogger]

ExPlOiTaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaation is the name of the game!

you choose the level of the game.

[Fuckin Bill]

You guys are nuts. It's a girl's back for christ sake. You'd see more of her body in a bathing suit at the beach and nobody would bat an eyelash.

[Damian ex]

Its news here in the UK - One presenter said just a few hours ago that he looked and thought 'that's hot' - then he read she was 15 and told everyone they are pervs for looking at her.

I don't get it. She either turns you on or she doesn't.