|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Radio and TV | NP Shop | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Adult Webmasters Main Forum Friendly adult web master chat, help and information |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Build a bridge and get over it....
|
I think it is because she is a preteen role model. Her fan base is 9, 10, 11, year old girls.
Maybe I'm getting old, but I don't see the point of her laying across her fathers lap with her midriff showing or the point of this picture either. __________________
Cause chickens are decent people
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Uber whore
|
She's not even nice or anything. I think she's a big ugly. Duckly
![]() __________________
Paul's Pornlinks - The best Webmaster Tips and Tricks Blog Directory: Porno Blog Links - Dr Porno Pimp --- Blog link trades: Trade with my blogs HERE! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
I can change this but I can't be arsed.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 465
Points: 1,045
|
Precisely. A category 1 image in the UK is defined as "Images depicting erotic posing with no sexual activity". My understanding is that this categorisation includes clothed or semi-clothed images. By that definition the image is illegal.
Having said that, I believe the BBC have reproduced the images on their web site - and I'm sure their lawyers know more than I do ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
The Host with the Most!
|
Well ... she obviously has parental consent to act like a bubble gum slut, so I guess that's all that matters ...
Remember, that until there is penetration, they are art photos .. sad but true ... __________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Little Princess
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Netpond Resources | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Resource Directory | Tutorials & Articles | ||