Go Back   Netpond ™ > Webmaster Forums and Resources > New Adult Webmaster Forum
Register FAQ Calendar Radio and TV NP Shop Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

New Adult Webmaster Forum Newbie adult web master help and guidance

Megasite
PluginFeeds Reality, College Reality, College
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2008, 08:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
david123
Im starting to love this place and the points dont matter lol
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 25
Points: 115
Adult sites and Amazon S3 / EC2

Anybody has any experience with hosting an adult paysite on Amazon's S3 and using EC2? What are you thoughts on this new 'unlimited' storage and cheap processing power?
__________________
David
video and web 2.0 geek
david123 is offline   Reply With Quote Send a private message to david123
Old 05-08-2008, 09:00 AM   #2 (permalink)
Rofl
Poom Poom Rule!
 
Rofl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Old Blighty
Posts: 2,514
Points: 4,460
Send a message via ICQ to Rofl
Hey, ya know what?

I read their terms and conditions, and IT DOES look like adult is OK, as long as it is legal adult.

Anyone shed some more light on this?

This is very interesting indeed, very interesting time for me too ... hmmm scratches chin...
Rofl is online now   Reply With Quote Send a private message to Rofl
Old 05-08-2008, 09:05 AM   #3 (permalink)
david123
Im starting to love this place and the points dont matter lol
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 25
Points: 115
a little math
JavaScript-based Amazon Web Services Simple Monthly Calculator

from the looks of things, it is not cheap. BUT it is reliable. so if your concern is geo distribution, maximum availability, fast sites, unlimited storage, then it could be the way to go.
__________________
David
video and web 2.0 geek
david123 is offline   Reply With Quote Send a private message to david123
Old 05-08-2008, 11:35 AM   #4 (permalink)
josico
Im starting to love this place and the points dont matter lol
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 20
Points: 100
Send a message via ICQ to josico
I'm not sure if I'm reading this wrong or not, but it seems like S3 is for storage so that files can be accessed anywhere and EC2 is for computing power, to make the transactions of files etc faster. I can't seem to see anywhere about hosting websites etc. Aside from Amazon AWS, but that only allows sites that drive traffic back to Amazon.

Referenced from:
Amazon.com: Browse Amazon Web Services

EDIT: I guess what I wanted to say was that it is more like an external hard drive that's on the internet.
josico is offline   Reply With Quote Send a private message to josico
Old 05-08-2008, 12:10 PM   #5 (permalink)
Rofl
Poom Poom Rule!
 
Rofl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Old Blighty
Posts: 2,514
Points: 4,460
Send a message via ICQ to Rofl
Quote:
Amazon S3 provides a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. Using this web service, developers can easily build applications that make use of Internet storage. Since Amazon S3 is highly scalable and you only pay for what you use, developers can start small and grow their application as they wish, with no compromise on performance or reliability. It is designed to be highly flexible: Store any type and amount of data that you want; read the same piece of data a million times or only for emergency disaster recovery; build a simple FTP application, or a sophisticated web application such as the Amazon.com retail web site. Amazon S3 frees developers to focus on innovation, not figuring out how to store their data.
From Here: Amazon.com: Amazon S3 FAQs: Amazon Web Services
Rofl is online now   Reply With Quote Send a private message to Rofl
Old 05-08-2008, 12:25 PM   #6 (permalink)
josico
Im starting to love this place and the points dont matter lol
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 20
Points: 100
Send a message via ICQ to josico
So from that I still read that it can only store and retrieve data. So even for the 'sophisticated web application', I'm guessing that it means that stuff like the DB, images etc are stored there and accessed through another web server. IE, you can't install apache etc on there. It is like I said above, more like a external hard drive, a container for you to expand your business.

For example, EC2 would allow for quicker access to the DB stored on S3 due to greater computing power, without needing to upgrade to a top of the line server, it scales computing power to what you need. And S3 allows for 'unlimited' space for applications like webmail etc.
josico is offline   Reply With Quote Send a private message to josico
Old 05-08-2008, 12:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Rofl
Poom Poom Rule!
 
Rofl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Old Blighty
Posts: 2,514
Points: 4,460
Send a message via ICQ to Rofl
Oh yes, sorry man, I see what you mean.

Yes, I see it as a backend for an actual site you have got hosted elsewhere.
Rofl is online now   Reply With Quote Send a private message to Rofl
Old 05-08-2008, 06:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
david123
Im starting to love this place and the points dont matter lol
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 25
Points: 115
josico is correct. generally, they provide reliability. by hosting the content on S3 and using EC2 for the computing (data retrieval, etc.), you are basically covered and guaranteed 99.99% uptime. I mean real 99.99%, not what you actually experience at hosting companies who state the same.

EC2 can run linux instances and be used for the data retrieval, but I can only see really being used by sites that either want to pay more for reliability, or sites that have millions of hits a day from all over the world.

But for example, if you got a site that has a ton of HD videos, and download speeds are annoying your clients, then using S3 could be a solution.

Anyways, I don't think Amazon is gonna replace regular hosting just yet, but it's headed that way. Please note, that Google has launched something similar, but nothing like Amazon yet..... 'yet' is the keyword. (we know Google will eventually make something even better).
__________________
David
video and web 2.0 geek
david123 is offline   Reply With Quote Send a private message to david123
Old 05-08-2008, 07:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
thebes
Getting back into the biz
 
thebes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Back in the Belly of the Beast
Posts: 2,170
Points: 2,530
I'd looked at a while back for a project, but it seems it can only do storage and you need to use a special api for it. I could see it being good, maybe, to serve a large program's videos from...
thebes is online now   Reply With Quote Send a private message to thebes
Old 05-08-2008, 07:56 PM   #10 (permalink)
fsudirectory
I get paid(hopefully) to watch porn
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 759
Points: 2,555
Many new start-ups use these services to enable them to have reliable hosting and easy scaling if/when their companies expand.
fsudirectory is online now   Reply With Quote Send a private message to fsudirectory
Old 05-08-2008, 09:45 PM   #11 (permalink)
Boddog
HD :: DH
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 356
Points: 35
amazon allow free web service

wow that is super interesting

I will take a look tx
Boddog is offline   Reply With Quote Send a private message to Boddog
Old 05-08-2008, 10:40 PM   #12 (permalink)
josico
Im starting to love this place and the points dont matter lol
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 20
Points: 100
Send a message via ICQ to josico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boddog View Post
amazon allow free web service

wow that is super interesting

I will take a look tx
Yeah, but from what I understand the free web service is only to be used to promote their sites and / or products. Not for your own use.

And a comment about the 'real' 99.99% reliability. Most of the traffic will still need to be funnelled through your own host, so realistically, and correct me if I'm wrong, but any point in time where your host is down, the clients won't be able to access the data anyways. So you are back to square one. That is unless the api allows your clients to access the data directly with out your host? I doubt that you'd be able to do that though.
josico is offline   Reply With Quote Send a private message to josico
Old 05-11-2008, 05:06 AM   #13 (permalink)
david123
Im starting to love this place and the points dont matter lol
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 25
Points: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by josico View Post
Yeah, but from what I understand the free web service is only to be used to promote their sites and / or products. Not for your own use.

And a comment about the 'real' 99.99% reliability. Most of the traffic will still need to be funnelled through your own host, so realistically, and correct me if I'm wrong, but any point in time where your host is down, the clients won't be able to access the data anyways. So you are back to square one. That is unless the api allows your clients to access the data directly with out your host? I doubt that you'd be able to do that though.
I am pretty sure that this is where EC2 comes in. It is basically the linux end of your site. So you start an EC2 instance, install linux, put up your site on S3 and pull the html files from there. So you won't any other hosting for anything. Right now, this is all a matter of finding people who have experience in setting these things up. In a few months mass migration could begin, and people drop their old hosting and move to amazon (they just lowered their prices).
here are some current tools for amazon:
Manage Your Membership · InfiniteBits :: Web and FTP access to Amazon S3 :: Online Data Backup :: FTP Server for Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) :: Amazon Web Services :: Transfer Files to S3 :: S3 Backup
Amazon S3 Tools | elastic8
__________________
David
video and web 2.0 geek
david123 is offline   Reply With Quote Send a private message to david123
Old 05-11-2008, 06:06 AM   #14 (permalink)
thebes
Getting back into the biz
 
thebes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Back in the Belly of the Beast
Posts: 2,170
Points: 2,530
Well, EC2 sounds a lot more interesting and useful than just S3. I presume you've got root and absolute control over your virtual box?. If adult is allowed then you could get a dedicated box for as low as 72 bucks a month (plus 100 for a terrabyte, say, but you only pay for what you use). I wonder how difficult their image tool is to use, and how it works with things like IP addresses. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
thebes is online now   Reply With Quote Send a private message to thebes
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes



Netpond Resources
Resource Directory Tutorials & Articles Webmaster Tools Netpond News
 
Netpond Resources
LoveDollars WildCash PussyCash Royal-Cash
Fetish Hits Cyberwurx MaxCash Fuck You Cash
AEBN GroobyBucks HD Pays PluginFeeds
Rabbits Reviews CraziesCash TrafficCashGold EvilAngelCash
Orgycash BigClicks Webcams Adult Pay Master
Free Porn Paradise British Porno British Porn Models ShanesworldCash
Shemale, Asian Live Sex Cams
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios