New gallery layout.. Id really appreciate feedback!

[ArseWithClass]

Hi guys, Im hoping this is the correct forum, It does say show off your skills etc.. But im not sure if anyone is gonna think its spam!...

I was working untill 4in the morning last night making this & another one with the similar layout.
Enjoy the pics anyway... its nice peeking up Natalies skirt lol!

ARSEWITHCLASS.COM - British sluts spunked over!

[rogue]

wow! that is a heck of a lot of pictures! i'd lose a row. also add a text link under your top banner, its not obvious its a banner at the moment, also i would cosider removing the gspot url and making the 2257 a non-clickable url because many TGPs have a limit on how many outward bound links you can have.
the pics are huge, not only in size but in bytes as well, both need shrinking down.

[theNewGuy]

The design isn't bad. That is a damn lot of pics and they are huge. Also I was told recently by a reviewer that declined my submission because of no nudity without scroll. (something to that effect). I am using a 17" mon (i think) and I do not see the first row of thumbs. just my thoughts

[AbsolutePorn]

Too much free porn
Let about 5/10 pics off...
Make it only 15/16

[samsun]

Originally Posted by rogue

wow! that is a heck of a lot of pictures! i'd lose a row. also add a text link under your top banner, its not obvious its a banner at the moment, also i would cosider removing the gspot url and making the 2257 a non-clickable url because many TGPs have a limit on how many outward bound links you can have.
the pics are huge, not only in size but in bytes as well, both need shrinking down.

This really says it all. The only thing I would add is if you want to look at SOE you should do some research and make some changes to what you finally want to get. One example is a higher word to text ratio on the page.

[Dupont]

I agree.. keep the pic counts under 20

[ArseWithClass]

Keeping uder 20 pics on the galleries would make my job alot easier as I am not sure if you can edit a load at once & end up do each individually!

I know most places like thehun wouldnt allow 15 or 16 pics though... not enough!

The size of the pics im not too fussed about, I usually optimize them to medium quality which on Adobe is 8 rather than up at 12.
It gives my viewers something good to look at, as our reviews on Rabbits review said, "the movie quality is Stellar" He thought they were fantastic & you felt like you were there.

Thanks for some comments... It would have been nice to hear that some of you liked the naughtyness of Natalie, or that I must have worked hard.. lol I was up untill 4 in the morning! (thats me getting the punch in the face!)

[rogue]

Originally Posted by ArseWithClass

I know most places like thehun wouldnt allow 15 or 16 pics though... not enough!

i dont know where you have this idea from, its not true.

Originally Posted by ArseWithClass

The size of the pics im not too fussed about, I usually optimize them to medium quality which on Adobe is 8 rather than up at 12.
It gives my viewers something good to look at, as our reviews on Rabbits review said, "the movie quality is Stellar" He thought they were fantastic & you felt like you were there.

not wanting to bring the past up but you was warned on another forum ages ago about your file sizes, not only do you add unneccery strain on your servers with huge file sizes but you will also lose customers as well, very few people actually have superfast broadband connections and all surfers have a very short attention span, if the pics dont load just about instantly then you have lost them, they'll close the page and move on.

[incider]

Originally Posted by ArseWithClass

Keeping uder 20 pics on the galleries would make my job alot easier as I am not sure if you can edit a load at once & end up do each individually!

Depending on what software you use to edit your pics it is possible to automate it.
I use Photoshop CS and it possible in there as I do it all the time (thank god or would spend a lot of time editing)

[ArseWithClass]

Originally Posted by rogue

i dont know where you have this idea from, its not true.



not wanting to bring the past up but you was warned on another forum ages ago about your file sizes, not only do you add unneccery strain on your servers with huge file sizes but you will also lose customers as well, very few people actually have superfast broadband connections and all surfers have a very short attention span, if the pics dont load just about instantly then you have lost them, they'll close the page and move on.

What are you chatting about!
Most surfers now are on at least 4mg!

& talking of other forums as said on one single forum... a forum run by a prat & having only a cpl of other prats on it.. My server is capable of dealing with these size files!
The well known companies like **********, realsexcash & many others do not optimize to a lower frame. They want, like I want... The best for our members & surfers.

[ArseWithClass]

Originally Posted by incider

Depending on what software you use to edit your pics it is possible to automate it.
I use Photoshop CS and it possible in there as I do it all the time (thank god or would spend a lot of time editing)

I would be interested to learn the automate system.

I tried once but ended up with them all on a click through link so showing all the pictures in one box.

Ill look into it Thanks Bud.

[rogue]

Originally Posted by ArseWithClass

& talking of other forums as said on one single forum... a forum run by a prat & having only a cpl of other prats on it.. My server is capable of dealing with these size files!
The well known companies like **********, realsexcash & many others do not optimize to a lower frame. They want, like I want... The best for our members & surfers.

LOL, you was told on the other forum about your file sizes and when the Hun first listed you, your whole server crashed.
i dunno what the censured sponsor was but i know that RealSexCash DO optimise their pictures and every other sponsor does as well. we are talking about a gallery here remember.
anyway you asked for our opinions on your gallery but if, like usual you choose to ignore it, they why bother asking?

[rogue]

Originally Posted by ArseWithClass

What are you chatting about!
Most surfers now are on at least 4mg!

prove it. i cannot and i live 20 miles from london the best i can have is 2meg, most people in the UK have to be within (i think) 2 miles of an exchange to get high speed broadband and there are even still parts of the UK restricted to 56k.
A heck of a lot of people stay with 56k or low speeds because they hardly ever use the internet or are not download freaks.

[Adult Banner Exchange]

I like the layout Gary, nice work !

[gecko]

Nice clean layout.. just reduce 5-7 pics

[ArseWithClass]

LOL... I thought I would check out some other gallery picture sizes & ended up downloading a virus or 2!

My system has been down for the last 3 or 4 days!!!!

Serves me right in not just doing what I think is best & finding out what others are doing!

Anyway, cheers AdultBanner, Gecko & all the others for your comments.
Ill be saving myself a bit of time by just offering 16 or 20 pics, but ill be keeping the size of each pic at 750*1000 for nice closeup action on Natalies arse!

[wildwebcamgirls]

not only do you add unneccery strain on your servers with huge file sizes but you will also lose customers as well, very few people actually have superfast broadband connections and all surfers have a very short attention span, if the pics dont load just about instantly then you have lost them, they'll close the page and move on.

The man speaks the truth. 600x700 isn't a bad picture size. Just big enough to see the juicy details but just small enough to keep file size (as jpg) at about 15-50 kb which loads quick almost no matter what.

[ArseWithClass]

After carefull consideration, I thought Id at least try out a gallery in a style with less content & smaller pictures..

ADULT-EXCITEMENT.CO.UK - British wife flashes her pussy in public

I like it! what do you think???