 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Radio and TV | NP Shop | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Search Engine Optimisation Forum SEO discussion and information |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-16-2006, 08:19 AM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Ze Uber-Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: riviera.fr.eu
Posts: 5,823
Points: 215
 |
Google Images: image size definitions?
Anybody knows the limit between 'medium' and 'large' in google image search?
My empirical checks seem to show that to be declared 'large' an image must be at least 600 on the short side AND 800 on the long side, but I'd be interested if any of you found a more precise definition... |
|
|
|
05-16-2006, 09:27 PM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Blogging. Caffeine. Shame.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,400
Points: 225
|
That sounds pretty reasonable, but my searches for adult terms on image search get me a lot of redirecting and images no longer found.
__________________
More Sex Blogs Directory - Seo friendly hardlinks ! |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 03:10 AM
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
--------------------------
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,168
Points: 220
|
but my searches for adult terms on image search get me a lot of redirecting.
:0 hehhehe there was a time when I used to stip my images back in size and reduce them as much as I possiably could, now I finding myself increasing image size more and more.... |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 10:12 AM
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Ze Uber-Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: riviera.fr.eu
Posts: 5,823
Points: 215
|
Quote:
And that's only when there's extra bandwidth involved, because with a good image processing program it's possible to have very big images with a very good quality but very light in filesize. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
 |
 |
Linear Mode
