[Tutorial] How to make $1000/month with blogs... - Page 14

hardcoreblogger · 03-18-2008, 02:17 PM

elpollo, you've already taken the right conclusion. my 2 cents are that the keyword "cunt" will never convert great, because it is extremely broad. i had some very good "wet pussy" rankings and it was similar, very low conversions for membership sites. only dating worked well there.

good luck with your new niched blogs!

ElPolloDiablo · 03-18-2008, 02:30 PM

Thanks Bob. I'll fix the metatags soon!

About the keyword density..... that's a funny thing actually.

See, I was afraid of over-using the word so I've toned down on it in the past. Maybe I should be using it a tiny bit more than I'm doing right now.

I see there's a lot of keyword checkers on the web. What tool did you personally use to check my keyword density?

bobsbetterboob · 03-18-2008, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElPolloDiablo

Thanks Bob. I'll fix the metatags soon!

About the keyword density..... that's a funny thing actually.

See, I was afraid of over-using the word so I've toned down on it in the past. Maybe I should be using it a tiny bit more than I'm doing right now.

I see there's a lot of keyword checkers on the web. What tool did you personally use to check my keyword density?

I think you're fine as long as you don't go much over 3% for your specific keyword. I have been told that the SE's consider it spammy if it begins to go over 3%.

I use the SEOQuake toolbar for Firefox. It has a cool density checker built in.

rvince · 03-18-2008, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hardcoreblogger

my 2 cents are that the keyword "cunt" will never convert great, because it is extremely broad.

Exactly what I'm thinking...
'cunt' isn't a niche... it's just a keyword...
but if you are getting traffic from this keyword, I'd rather feature some cameltoes... and try to make more posts to rake more keywords combinations ("teen cunts", ....)

papagmp · 03-18-2008, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rvince

Exactly what I'm thinking...
'cunt' isn't a niche... it's just a keyword...
but if you are getting traffic from this keyword, I'd rather feature some cameltoes... and try to make more posts to rake more keywords combinations ("teen cunts", ....)

I do pretty damn good on "cunt" as a keyword - more specifically "tint cunt" and it converts well on my BMYS site - kinda popped up unexpected as I must be using "tiny cunt" in my posts. Come to think of it, I kinda like tiny cunts.....

ElPolloDiablo · 03-25-2008, 02:04 PM

Over 4 months ago, I set up the following blog:

Big Fucking Boobs! - thumblogger.com

It's a niche. It's got handwritten posts scheduled to be posted over the span of a year. It's got 10 PR3 links set up to it.

The blog gets negligable SE-traffic and hasn't gotten any PR yet.

This bugs me, because it might happen to the niche-blogs that I am now running on their own domains.

Does anybody have any idea what might have gone wrong with that thumblogger blog of mine?

bobsbetterboob · 03-25-2008, 02:23 PM

You're not hitting your keyword targets.

breasts K, D 5 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.32 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00
boobs T, K, D 4 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.25 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00
tits K, D 2 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.13 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00

I'm not an SEO expert, but I have been told in order to get the spiders to associate your site with a specific keyword, then it needs to be keyword rich.

I hope that makes some sense.

fresh · 03-25-2008, 02:38 PM

Density would be better at 2% rathen than 3%

pimp3611 · 03-25-2008, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobsbetterboob

You're not hitting your keyword targets.

breasts K, D 5 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.32 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00
boobs T, K, D 4 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.25 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00
tits K, D 2 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.13 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00

I'm not an SEO expert, but I have been told in order to get the spiders to associate your site with a specific keyword, then it needs to be keyword rich.

I hope that makes some sense.

bobsbetterboob what tool are using for those results?

ElPolloDiablo · 03-25-2008, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobsbetterboob

You're not hitting your keyword targets.

breasts K, D 5 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.32 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00
boobs T, K, D 4 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.25 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00
tits K, D 2 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.13 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00

I'm not an SEO expert, but I have been told in order to get the spiders to associate your site with a specific keyword, then it needs to be keyword rich.

I hope that makes some sense.

Ofcourse!!!

We have just discussed keyword density in the posts above...

I'm such an idiot.

bobsbetterboob · 03-25-2008, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimp3611

bobsbetterboob what tool are using for those results?

I use the SEOQuake toolbar for Firefox.

SeoQuake - extension for Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox browsers

bobsbetterboob · 03-25-2008, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fresh

Density would be better at 2% rathen than 3%

Yeah, you're right. I don't know why I said 3%. Thanks Fresh.

ElPolloDiablo · 03-25-2008, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobsbetterboob

Yeah, you're right. I don't know why I said 3%. Thanks Fresh.

I made a note of this as well.

hardcoreblogger · 03-26-2008, 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fresh

Density would be better at 2% rathen than 3%

imho the exact keyword density is not that important nowadays. yes, of course the keyword should figure prominently in title, h1 and several times in the text. people say google doesn't like more than 2% - i have a site in the top5 in google for a very competitive 1-word-keyword that has more than 7% density... other factors are much more important.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElPolloDiablo

Over 4 months ago, I set up the following blog:

Big Fucking Boobs! - thumblogger.com

It's a niche. It's got handwritten posts scheduled to be posted over the span of a year. It's got 10 PR3 links set up to it.

The blog gets negligable SE-traffic and hasn't gotten any PR yet.

This bugs me, because it might happen to the niche-blogs that I am now running on their own domains.

Does anybody have any idea what might have gone wrong with that thumblogger blog of mine?

first of all you have optimized this blog for the term "big fucking boobs" which hardly gets any searches. the other terms bobsbetterboob has mentioned are very general and very competitive. if you do some keyword research you will find more suitable 2- or 3-word boobs terms that get good traffic and are not that competitive.

secondly my guess is you have hardly built any backlinks. content updates are not enough, you do need backlinks to gain SE rankings and traffic.

hardcoreblogger · 03-26-2008, 04:30 AM

sorry i overlooked the part with the pr3 links. yahoo does show some backlinks, but many of them cannot be found anymore https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.co...F&bwm=i&bwms=p

the key with backlinks is to add more and more slowly and gradually, so it looks to the search engines like a natural link growth

rvince · 03-26-2008, 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElPolloDiablo

Over 4 months ago, I set up the following blog:

Big Fucking Boobs! - thumblogger.com

It's a niche. It's got handwritten posts scheduled to be posted over the span of a year. It's got 10 PR3 links set up to it.

The blog gets negligable SE-traffic and hasn't gotten any PR yet.

This bugs me, because it might happen to the niche-blogs that I am now running on their own domains.

Does anybody have any idea what might have gone wrong with that thumblogger blog of mine?

What do you call "negligable SE-traffic"? 10 visits/day? 100? 500?

In any way, your site isn't following many of the advises I've given in my tutorial and in this thread, just to name a few:
- it's using a free hosting service.
- you seem to promote a single paysite/sponsor only.
- you link to FHGs in every post.
- your sales text doesn't talk to the surfer; it looks like it's directly copied/pasted from the site tours! be a bit more original!

ElPolloDiablo · 03-26-2008, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rvince

What do you call "negligable SE-traffic"? 10 visits/day? 100? 500?

More like 60 a month.

Quote:

In any way, your site isn't following many of the advises I've given in my tutorial and in this thread, just to name a few:
- it's using a free hosting service.
- you seem to promote a single paysite/sponsor only.
- you link to FHGs in every post.
- your sales text doesn't talk to the surfer; it looks like it's directly copied/pasted from the site tours! be a bit more original!

That's because I set it up before I started reading your thread.

I set this one up after being inspired by a thread from Twan, Thumblogger owner. He said if you'd set up enough thumbloggers like so, simply describing the action, you'd get SE and conversions from it.

I'd rather do it your way though. My latest blogs should be okay.

If I show them to you in private, will you give me feedback on them?

03-18-2008, 02:17 PM	#261 (permalink)
hardcoreblogger bloggin' hardcore Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: On The Cape Posts: 3,687 Points: 915	elpollo, you've already taken the right conclusion. my 2 cents are that the keyword "cunt" will never convert great, because it is extremely broad. i had some very good "wet pussy" rankings and it was similar, very low conversions for membership sites. only dating worked well there. good luck with your new niched blogs! __________________ Make NO MONEY with my favorite SHEMALE SPONSORS! Learn SEO online and get tons of FREE targeted traffic! $$$ Domain Parking - Get Adult PPC Traffic - AMC converts below 1:100 for me

03-18-2008, 02:30 PM	#262 (permalink)
ElPolloDiablo I am the Demon Chicken! Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Netherlands! Posts: 178 Points: 915	Thanks Bob. I'll fix the metatags soon! About the keyword density..... that's a funny thing actually. See, I was afraid of over-using the word so I've toned down on it in the past. Maybe I should be using it a tiny bit more than I'm doing right now. I see there's a lot of keyword checkers on the web. What tool did you personally use to check my keyword density? __________________ My favorite sponsors: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Trade Links With Me On Thunder-Ball!!! 6,000GB Bandwidth For $7.95??? You Betcha!!!

03-25-2008, 02:04 PM	#266 (permalink)
ElPolloDiablo I am the Demon Chicken! Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Netherlands! Posts: 178 Points: 915	Over 4 months ago, I set up the following blog: Big Fucking Boobs! - thumblogger.com It's a niche. It's got handwritten posts scheduled to be posted over the span of a year. It's got 10 PR3 links set up to it. The blog gets negligable SE-traffic and hasn't gotten any PR yet. This bugs me, because it might happen to the niche-blogs that I am now running on their own domains. Does anybody have any idea what might have gone wrong with that thumblogger blog of mine? __________________ My favorite sponsors: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Trade Links With Me On Thunder-Ball!!! 6,000GB Bandwidth For $7.95??? You Betcha!!!

03-25-2008, 02:23 PM	#267 (permalink)
bobsbetterboob What the fuck is an Infraction? Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 175 Points: 875	You're not hitting your keyword targets. breasts K, D 5 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.32 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00 boobs T, K, D 4 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.25 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00 tits K, D 2 (number of times mentioned in homepage) 0.13 (keyword density) This density needs to be around 3.00 I'm not an SEO expert, but I have been told in order to get the spiders to associate your site with a specific keyword, then it needs to be keyword rich. I hope that makes some sense. __________________ Want sites that convert? Check out My Top Sponsors UPDATED WITH JUNE'S STATS

03-25-2008, 02:38 PM	#268 (permalink)
fresh so fresh and so clean Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: I like You. See Sig Posts: 14,749 Points: 30	Density would be better at 2% rathen than 3% __________________ MY FAVORITE HOSTING: Unlimited sites, 1000GB of BW for just 9.95$ 99.9% uptime, 24/7 live support Here Check out new Netpond Sponsor: FlashCash - Instant payouts - you get 1 signup, you get paid instantly. No minimums, no need to leave money on the table

03-26-2008, 04:30 AM	#275 (permalink)
hardcoreblogger bloggin' hardcore Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: On The Cape Posts: 3,687 Points: 915	sorry i overlooked the part with the pr3 links. yahoo does show some backlinks, but many of them cannot be found anymore https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.co...F&bwm=i&bwms=p the key with backlinks is to add more and more slowly and gradually, so it looks to the search engines like a natural link growth __________________ Make NO MONEY with my favorite SHEMALE SPONSORS! Learn SEO online and get tons of FREE targeted traffic! $$$ Domain Parking - Get Adult PPC Traffic - AMC converts below 1:100 for me